hi all - apologies for the last-minute notes.
group 1 (alicia, lauren, melamie, sidsel) :
the discussion surrounding our question, "can performance lecture create affective spaces and invite the audience to embody the theory?", and our example performance lecture by cally spooner (UK) resulted in more questions than answers, without a clear logical answer or result, prompting instead an enacting of corradi fiumara's idea about listening bucking with logocentrism.
the reading chosen from corradi fiumara's text spoke of "speaking at length about something does not offer the slightest guarantee that thereby understanding is advanced" and of a "sham clarity - the unintelligibility of the trivial" which, at first glance, happened to coalesce with the description of the performance lecture: